SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
XML

XML static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs and Code Smells in your XML code

  • All rules 37
  • Vulnerability7
  • Bug5
  • Security Hotspot9
  • Code Smell16
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Components should be explicitly exported

           Vulnerability
        2. Defining a single permission for read and write access of content providers is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        3. Custom permissions should not be defined in the "android.permission" namespace

           Vulnerability
        4. Allowing application backups is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        5. Requesting dangerous Android permissions is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        6. Exported component access should be restricted with appropriate permissions

           Vulnerability
        7. Using clear-text protocols is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        8. Receiving intents is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        9. Having a permissive Cross-Origin Resource Sharing policy is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        10. Delivering code in production with debug features activated is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        11. Hibernate should not update database schemas

           Bug
        12. "DefaultMessageListenerContainer" instances should not drop messages during restarts

           Bug
        13. "SingleConnectionFactory" instances should be set to "reconnectOnException"

           Bug
        14. pom elements should be in the recommended order

           Code Smell
        15. Dependencies should not have "system" scope

           Bug
        16. Deprecated "${pom}" properties should not be used

           Code Smell
        17. Artifact ids should follow a naming convention

           Code Smell
        18. Group ids should follow a naming convention

           Code Smell
        19. Track uses of disallowed dependencies

           Code Smell
        20. Struts validation forms should have unique names

           Vulnerability
        21. "action" mappings should not have too many "forward" entries

           Code Smell
        22. Struts filters should not miss their corresponding filter-map

           Vulnerability
        23. Creating cookies without the "HttpOnly" flag is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        24. EJB interceptor exclusions should be declared as annotations

           Code Smell
        25. Default EJB interceptors should be declared in "ejb-jar.xml"

           Vulnerability
        26. Basic authentication should not be used

           Vulnerability
        27. Newlines should follow each element

           Code Smell
        28. XML parser failure

           Code Smell
        29. Hard-coded credentials are security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        30. XML files containing a prolog header should start with "<?xml" characters

           Bug
        31. Track breaches of an XPath rule

           Code Smell
        32. Sections of code should not be commented out

           Code Smell
        33. Track uses of "TODO" tags

           Code Smell
        34. Track uses of "FIXME" tags

           Code Smell
        35. Source code should be indented consistently

           Code Smell
        36. Tabulation characters should not be used

           Code Smell
        37. Lines should not be too long

           Code Smell

        Track uses of "TODO" tags

        intentionality - complete
        maintainability
        Code Smell
        • cwe

        Why is this an issue?

        More Info

        Developers often use TODO tags to mark areas in the code where additional work or improvements are needed but are not implemented immediately. However, these TODO tags sometimes get overlooked or forgotten, leading to incomplete or unfinished code. This rule aims to identify and address unattended TODO tags to ensure a clean and maintainable codebase. This description explores why this is a problem and how it can be fixed to improve the overall code quality.

        What is the potential impact?

        Unattended TODO tags in code can have significant implications for the development process and the overall codebase.

        Incomplete Functionality: When developers leave TODO tags without implementing the corresponding code, it results in incomplete functionality within the software. This can lead to unexpected behavior or missing features, adversely affecting the end-user experience.

        Missed Bug Fixes: If developers do not promptly address TODO tags, they might overlook critical bug fixes and security updates. Delayed bug fixes can result in more severe issues and increase the effort required to resolve them later.

        Impact on Collaboration: In team-based development environments, unattended TODO tags can hinder collaboration. Other team members might not be aware of the intended changes, leading to conflicts or redundant efforts in the codebase.

        Codebase Bloat: The accumulation of unattended TODO tags over time can clutter the codebase and make it difficult to distinguish between work in progress and completed code. This bloat can make it challenging to maintain an organized and efficient codebase.

        Addressing this code smell is essential to ensure a maintainable, readable, reliable codebase and promote effective collaboration among developers.

        Noncompliant code example

        <!-- TODO Drop this dependency -->
        <dependency>
          <groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
          <artifactId>commons-lang3</artifactId>
          <version>3.8.1</version>
        </dependency>
        
          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube Community BuildAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Available Since
          9.1
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use