SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Java

Java static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your JAVA code

  • All rules 733
  • Vulnerability60
  • Bug175
  • Security Hotspot40
  • Code Smell458

  • Quick Fix 65
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Sensitive information should not be logged in production builds

           Vulnerability
        2. WebViews should not be vulnerable to cross-app scripting attacks

           Vulnerability
        3. Privileged prompts should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        4. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to traversing attacks

           Vulnerability
        5. Accessing files should not lead to filesystem oracle attacks

           Vulnerability
        6. Environment variables should not be defined from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        7. Credentials should not be hard-coded

           Vulnerability
        8. Counter Mode initialization vectors should not be reused

           Vulnerability
        9. XML operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        10. JSON operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        11. Thread suspensions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        12. Components should not be vulnerable to intent redirection

           Vulnerability
        13. XML signatures should be validated securely

           Vulnerability
        14. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        15. XML parsers should not load external schemas

           Vulnerability
        16. XML parsers should not allow inclusion of arbitrary files

           Vulnerability
        17. Mobile database encryption keys should not be disclosed

           Vulnerability
        18. Applications should not create session cookies from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        19. Reflection should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        20. Extracting archives should not lead to zip slip vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        21. OS commands should not be vulnerable to argument injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        22. A new session should be created during user authentication

           Vulnerability
        23. Authorizations should be based on strong decisions

           Vulnerability
        24. OpenSAML2 should be configured to prevent authentication bypass

           Vulnerability
        25. JWT should be signed and verified with strong cipher algorithms

           Vulnerability
        26. Cipher algorithms should be robust

           Vulnerability
        27. Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme

           Vulnerability
        28. Server hostnames should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        29. Server-side templates should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        30. Insecure temporary file creation methods should not be used

           Vulnerability
        31. Passwords should not be stored in plaintext or with a fast hashing algorithm

           Vulnerability
        32. Dynamic code execution should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        33. "ActiveMQConnectionFactory" should not be vulnerable to malicious code deserialization

           Vulnerability
        34. NoSQL operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        35. HTTP request redirections should not be open to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        36. Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        37. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        38. Deserialization should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        39. Endpoints should not be vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks

           Vulnerability
        40. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        41. Persistent entities should not be used as arguments of "@RequestMapping" methods

           Vulnerability
        42. "HttpSecurity" URL patterns should be correctly ordered

           Vulnerability
        43. LDAP connections should be authenticated

           Vulnerability
        44. Cryptographic keys should be robust

           Vulnerability
        45. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        46. Secure random number generators should not output predictable values

           Vulnerability
        47. Database queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        48. Cipher Block Chaining IVs should be unpredictable

           Vulnerability
        49. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

           Vulnerability
        50. Classes should not be loaded dynamically

           Vulnerability
        51. Basic authentication should not be used

           Vulnerability
        52. Regular expressions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        53. "HttpServletRequest.getRequestedSessionId()" should not be used

           Vulnerability
        54. A secure password should be used when connecting to a database

           Vulnerability
        55. XPath expressions should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        56. I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        57. LDAP queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        58. OS commands should not be vulnerable to command injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        59. Password hashing functions should use an unpredictable salt

           Vulnerability
        60. Exceptions should not be thrown from servlet methods

           Vulnerability

        Components should not be vulnerable to intent redirection

        intentionality - complete
        security
        Vulnerability
        • android
        • injection

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        Intent redirection vulnerabilities occur when an application publicly exposes a feature that uses an externally provided intent to start a new component.

        In that case, an application running on the same device as the affected one can launch the exposed, vulnerable component and provide it with a specially crafted intent. Depending on the application’s configuration and logic, this intent will be used in the context of the vulnerable application, which poses a security threat.

        What is the potential impact?

        An affected component that forwards a malicious externally provided intent does so using the vulnerable application’s context. In particular, the new component is created with the same permissions as the application and without limitations on what feature can be reached.

        Therefore, an attacker exploiting an intent redirection vulnerability could manage to access a private application’s components. Depending on the features privately exposed, this can lead to further exploitations, sensitive data disclosure, or even persistent code execution.

        Information disclosure

        An attacker can use the affected feature as a gateway to access other components of the vulnerable application, even if they are not exported. This includes features that handle sensitive information.

        Therefore, by crafting a malicious intent and submitting it to the vulnerable redirecting component, an attacker can retrieve most data exposed by private features. This affects the confidentiality of information that is not protected by an additional security mechanism, such as an encryption algorithm.

        Attack surface increase

        Because the attacker can access most components of the application, they can identify and exploit other vulnerabilities that would be present in them. The actual impact depends on the nested vulnerability. Exploitation probability depends on the in-depth security level of the application.

        Privilege escalation

        If the vulnerable application has privileges on the underlying devices, an attacker exploiting the redirection issue might take advantage of them. For example by crafting a malicious intent action, the attacker could be able to pass phone calls on behalf of the entitled application.

        This can lead to various attack scenarios depending on the exploited permissions.

        Persistent code execution

        A lot of applications rely on dynamic code loading to implement a variety of features, such as:

        • Minor feature updates.
        • Application package size reduction.
        • DRM or other code protection features.

        When a component exposes a dynamic code loading feature, an attacker could use it during the redirection’s exploitation to deploy malicious code into the application. The component can be located in the application itself or one of its dependencies.

        Such an attack would compromise the application execution environment entirely and lead to multiple security threats. The malicious code could:

        • Intercept and exfiltrate all data used in the application.
        • Steal authentication credentials to third-party services.
        • Change the application’s behavior to serve another malicious purpose (phishing, ransoming, etc)

        Note that in most cases, the deployed malware can persist application or hosting device restarts.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.3

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use