SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Java

Java static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your JAVA code

  • All rules 733
  • Vulnerability60
  • Bug175
  • Security Hotspot40
  • Code Smell458

  • Quick Fix 65
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Sensitive information should not be logged in production builds

           Vulnerability
        2. WebViews should not be vulnerable to cross-app scripting attacks

           Vulnerability
        3. Privileged prompts should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        4. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to traversing attacks

           Vulnerability
        5. Accessing files should not lead to filesystem oracle attacks

           Vulnerability
        6. Environment variables should not be defined from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        7. Credentials should not be hard-coded

           Vulnerability
        8. Counter Mode initialization vectors should not be reused

           Vulnerability
        9. XML operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        10. JSON operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        11. Thread suspensions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        12. Components should not be vulnerable to intent redirection

           Vulnerability
        13. XML signatures should be validated securely

           Vulnerability
        14. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        15. XML parsers should not load external schemas

           Vulnerability
        16. XML parsers should not allow inclusion of arbitrary files

           Vulnerability
        17. Mobile database encryption keys should not be disclosed

           Vulnerability
        18. Applications should not create session cookies from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        19. Reflection should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        20. Extracting archives should not lead to zip slip vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        21. OS commands should not be vulnerable to argument injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        22. A new session should be created during user authentication

           Vulnerability
        23. Authorizations should be based on strong decisions

           Vulnerability
        24. OpenSAML2 should be configured to prevent authentication bypass

           Vulnerability
        25. JWT should be signed and verified with strong cipher algorithms

           Vulnerability
        26. Cipher algorithms should be robust

           Vulnerability
        27. Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme

           Vulnerability
        28. Server hostnames should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        29. Server-side templates should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        30. Insecure temporary file creation methods should not be used

           Vulnerability
        31. Passwords should not be stored in plaintext or with a fast hashing algorithm

           Vulnerability
        32. Dynamic code execution should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        33. "ActiveMQConnectionFactory" should not be vulnerable to malicious code deserialization

           Vulnerability
        34. NoSQL operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        35. HTTP request redirections should not be open to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        36. Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        37. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        38. Deserialization should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        39. Endpoints should not be vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks

           Vulnerability
        40. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        41. Persistent entities should not be used as arguments of "@RequestMapping" methods

           Vulnerability
        42. "HttpSecurity" URL patterns should be correctly ordered

           Vulnerability
        43. LDAP connections should be authenticated

           Vulnerability
        44. Cryptographic keys should be robust

           Vulnerability
        45. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        46. Secure random number generators should not output predictable values

           Vulnerability
        47. Database queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        48. Cipher Block Chaining IVs should be unpredictable

           Vulnerability
        49. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

           Vulnerability
        50. Classes should not be loaded dynamically

           Vulnerability
        51. Basic authentication should not be used

           Vulnerability
        52. Regular expressions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        53. "HttpServletRequest.getRequestedSessionId()" should not be used

           Vulnerability
        54. A secure password should be used when connecting to a database

           Vulnerability
        55. XPath expressions should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        56. I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        57. LDAP queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        58. OS commands should not be vulnerable to command injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        59. Password hashing functions should use an unpredictable salt

           Vulnerability
        60. Exceptions should not be thrown from servlet methods

           Vulnerability

        Persistent entities should not be used as arguments of "@RequestMapping" methods

        consistency - conventional
        security
        Vulnerability
        • cwe
        • spring

        With Spring, when a request mapping method is configured to accept bean objects as arguments, the framework will automatically bind HTTP parameters to those objects' properties. If the targeted beans are also persistent entities, the framework will also store those properties in the storage backend, usually the application’s database.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        By accepting persistent entities as method arguments, the application allows clients to manipulate the object’s properties directly.

        What is the potential impact?

        Attackers could forge malicious HTTP requests that will alter unexpected properties of persistent objects. This can lead to unauthorized modifications of the entity’s state. This is known as a mass assignment attack.

        Depending on the affected objects and properties, the consequences can vary.

        Privilege escalation

        If the affected object is used to store the client’s identity or permissions, the attacker could alter it to change their entitlement on the application. This can lead to horizontal or vertical privilege escalation.

        Security checks bypass

        Because persistent objects are modified directly without prior logic, attackers could exploit this issue to bypass security measures otherwise enforced by the application. For example, an attacker might be able to change their e-mail address to an invalid one by directly setting it without going through the application’s email validation process.

        The same could also apply to passwords that attackers could change without complexity validation or knowledge of their current value.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube Community BuildAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Available Since
          9.1
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use