SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Java

Java static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your JAVA code

  • All rules 733
  • Vulnerability60
  • Bug175
  • Security Hotspot40
  • Code Smell458

  • Quick Fix 65
Filtered: 21 rules found
junit
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Methods setUp() and tearDown() should be correctly annotated starting with JUnit4

           Code Smell
        2. JUnit5 test classes and methods should not be silently ignored

           Bug
        3. Migrate your tests from JUnit4 to the new JUnit5 annotations

           Code Smell
        4. JUnit5 inner test classes should be annotated with @Nested

           Bug
        5. JUnit5 test classes and methods should have default package visibility

           Code Smell
        6. JUnit assertTrue/assertFalse should be simplified to the corresponding dedicated assertion

           Code Smell
        7. Only one method invocation is expected when testing checked exceptions

           Bug
        8. Assertion methods should not be used within the try block of a try-catch catching an Error

           Bug
        9. Only one method invocation is expected when testing runtime exceptions

           Code Smell
        10. Exception testing via JUnit @Test annotation should be avoided

           Code Smell
        11. Exception testing via JUnit ExpectedException rule should not be mixed with other assertions

           Code Smell
        12. Unit tests should throw exceptions

           Code Smell
        13. Assertion arguments should be passed in the correct order

           Code Smell
        14. JUnit rules should be used

           Code Smell
        15. Literal boolean values and nulls should not be used in assertions

           Code Smell
        16. Tests should include assertions

           Code Smell
        17. Test assertions should include messages

           Code Smell
        18. JUnit test cases should call super methods

           Code Smell
        19. TestCases should contain tests

           Code Smell
        20. JUnit assertions should not be used in "run" methods

           Code Smell
        21. JUnit4 @Ignored and JUnit5 @Disabled annotations should be used to disable tests and should provide a rationale

           Code Smell

        JUnit5 inner test classes should be annotated with @Nested

        adaptability - tested
        reliability
        Bug
        • junit
        • tests

        Why is this an issue?

        If not annotated with @Nested, an inner class containing some tests will never be executed during tests execution. While you could still be able to manually run its tests in an IDE, it won’t be the case during the build. By contrast, a static nested class containing some tests should not be annotated with @Nested, JUnit5 will not share setup and state with an instance of its enclosing class.

        This rule raises an issue on inner classes and static nested classes containing JUnit5 test methods which has a wrong usage of @Nested annotation.

        Note: This rule does not check if the context in which JUnit 5 is running (e.g. Maven Surefire Plugin) is properly configured to execute static nested classes, it could not be the case using the default configuration.

        Noncompliant code example

        import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
        
        class MyJunit5Test {
          @Test
          void test() { /* ... */ }
        
          class InnerClassTest { // Noncompliant, missing @Nested annotation
            @Test
            void test() { /* ... */ }
          }
        
          @Nested
          static class StaticNestedClassTest { // Noncompliant, invalid usage of @Nested annotation
            @Test
            void test() { /* ... */ }
          }
        }
        

        Compliant solution

        import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
        import org.junit.jupiter.api.Nested;
        
        class MyJunit5Test {
          @Test
          void test() { /* ... */ }
        
          @Nested
          class InnerClassTest {
            @Test
            void test() { /* ... */ }
          }
        
          static class StaticNestedClassTest {
            @Test
            void test() { /* ... */ }
          }
        }
        
          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube Community BuildAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Available Since
          9.1
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use