SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Java

Java static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your JAVA code

  • All rules 733
  • Vulnerability60
  • Bug175
  • Security Hotspot40
  • Code Smell458

  • Quick Fix 65
Filtered: 29 rules found
injection
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Sensitive information should not be logged in production builds

           Vulnerability
        2. WebViews should not be vulnerable to cross-app scripting attacks

           Vulnerability
        3. Privileged prompts should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        4. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to traversing attacks

           Vulnerability
        5. Accessing files should not lead to filesystem oracle attacks

           Vulnerability
        6. Environment variables should not be defined from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        7. XML operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        8. JSON operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        9. Thread suspensions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        10. Components should not be vulnerable to intent redirection

           Vulnerability
        11. Constructing arguments of system commands from user input is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        12. Applications should not create session cookies from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        13. Reflection should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        14. Extracting archives should not lead to zip slip vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        15. OS commands should not be vulnerable to argument injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        16. Server-side templates should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        17. Dynamic code execution should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        18. NoSQL operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        19. HTTP request redirections should not be open to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        20. Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        21. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        22. Deserialization should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        23. Endpoints should not be vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks

           Vulnerability
        24. Database queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        25. Regular expressions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        26. XPath expressions should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        27. I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        28. LDAP queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        29. OS commands should not be vulnerable to command injection attacks

           Vulnerability

        WebViews should not be vulnerable to cross-app scripting attacks

        intentionality - complete
        security
        Vulnerability
        • cwe
        • injection

        Cross-App Scripting is a variant of XSS that targets mobile applications using a WebView to display web content. It happens if the application accepts data from another, potentially malicious, application on the same device and passes it into its WebView without proper validation.

        An attacker can exploit this by creating a malicious application that sends specially prepared data to the vulnerable app. The vulnerability is triggered when the application passes theattacker’s malicious data to one of the WebView methods that executes HTML or JavaScript.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        When a malicious application successfully executes its own code inside your application’s WebView, it can operate within the trusted environment of your app. This means it can misuse the permissions and access that your users have granted to your WebView. Depending on the case, an accacker could execute JavaScript, redirect to phishing pages or access application’s private files.

        What is the potential impact?

        Theft of Sensitive Information

        If the WebView shows private user details, such as personal information, financial data, or confidential documents, a malicious script can copy this data and send it to an attacker. The script can also access session information, like cookies or authentication tokens.

        Account Takeover

        If an attacker obtains a user’s session token, they can often impersonate that user. The attacker can use the stolen token to access the user’s account from their own device without needing the user’s password. Once inside, they could have full access to the account, allowing them to view private data, change account settings, or lock the original user out.

        Displaying Deceptive Content

        An attacker’s script can change the content and appearance of the page shown in the WebView. For example, the script could display a fake login screen that looks identical to your app’s real one. If a user enters their username and password into this fake form, the script sends the credentials to the attacker. This technique is a form of phishing.

        Performing Unauthorized Actions

        Some applications set up a bridge that allows JavaScript in a WebView to communicate with the native part of the Android application. If this is the case, a malicious script could potentially use this bridge to perform actions on behalf of the user. Depending on your app’s features, this could include sending messages, modifying files, or accessing contacts.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use