While it’s perfectly legal to give a class the same simple name as a class in another package that it extends or interface it implements, it’s
confusing and could cause problems in the future.
Noncompliant Code Example
package my.mypackage;
public class Foo implements a.b.Foo { // Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
package my.mypackage;
public class FooJr implements a.b.Foo {
