Why is this an issue?
Constructors for String, BigInteger, BigDecimal and the objects used to wrap primitives should never be
used. Doing so is less clear and uses more memory than simply using the desired value in the case of strings, and using valueOf for
everything else.
Noncompliant code example
String empty = new String(); // Noncompliant; yields essentially "", so just use that.
String nonempty = new String("Hello world"); // Noncompliant
Double myDouble = new Double(1.1); // Noncompliant; use valueOf
Integer integer = new Integer(1); // Noncompliant
Boolean bool = new Boolean(true); // Noncompliant
BigInteger bigInteger1 = new BigInteger("3"); // Noncompliant
BigInteger bigInteger2 = new BigInteger("9223372036854775807"); // Noncompliant
BigInteger bigInteger3 = new BigInteger("111222333444555666777888999"); // Compliant, greater than Long.MAX_VALUE
Compliant solution
String empty = "";
String nonempty = "Hello world";
Double myDouble = Double.valueOf(1.1);
Integer integer = Integer.valueOf(1);
Boolean bool = Boolean.valueOf(true);
BigInteger bigInteger1 = BigInteger.valueOf(3);
BigInteger bigInteger2 = BigInteger.valueOf(9223372036854775807L);
BigInteger bigInteger3 = new BigInteger("111222333444555666777888999");
Exceptions
BigDecimal constructor with double argument is ignored as using valueOf instead might change resulting
value. See {rule:java:S2111} .
