SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Go

Go static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your GO code

  • All rules 70
  • Vulnerability20
  • Bug7
  • Security Hotspot14
  • Code Smell29
Filtered: 38 rules found
cwe
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Credentials should not be hard-coded

           Vulnerability
        2. Hard-coded secrets are security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        3. Constructing arguments of system commands from user input is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        4. Extracting archives should not lead to zip slip vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        5. JWT should be signed and verified with strong cipher algorithms

           Vulnerability
        6. Cipher algorithms should be robust

           Vulnerability
        7. Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme

           Vulnerability
        8. Server hostnames should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        9. Insecure temporary file creation methods should not be used

           Vulnerability
        10. Using publicly writable directories is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        11. Passwords should not be stored in plaintext or with a fast hashing algorithm

           Vulnerability
        12. Using clear-text protocols is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        13. HTTP request redirections should not be open to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        14. Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        15. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        16. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        17. Using weak hashing algorithms is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        18. Delivering code in production with debug features activated is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        19. Cryptographic keys should be robust

           Vulnerability
        20. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        21. Searching OS commands in PATH is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        22. Database queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        23. Creating cookies without the "HttpOnly" flag is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        24. Cipher Block Chaining IVs should be unpredictable

           Vulnerability
        25. Setting loose POSIX file permissions is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        26. Using pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        27. Creating cookies without the "secure" flag is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        28. XPath expressions should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        29. I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        30. Formatting SQL queries is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        31. OS commands should not be vulnerable to command injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        32. Hard-coded credentials are security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        33. Password hashing functions should use an unpredictable salt

           Vulnerability
        34. All code should be reachable

           Bug
        35. "switch" statements should have "default" clauses

           Code Smell
        36. Useless "if(true) {...}" and "if(false){...}" blocks should be removed

           Bug
        37. Track uses of "TODO" tags

           Code Smell
        38. Track uses of "FIXME" tags

           Code Smell

        Credentials should not be hard-coded

        responsibility - trustworthy
        security
        Vulnerability
        • cwe

        Secret leaks often occur when a sensitive piece of authentication data is stored with the source code of an application. Considering the source code is intended to be deployed across multiple assets, including source code repositories or application hosting servers, the secrets might get exposed to an unintended audience.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        In most cases, trust boundaries are violated when a secret is exposed in a source code repository or an uncontrolled deployment environment. Unintended people who don’t need to know the secret might get access to it. They might then be able to use it to gain unwanted access to associated services or resources.

        The trust issue can be more or less severe depending on the people’s role and entitlement.

        What is the potential impact?

        The consequences vary greatly depending on the situation and the secret-exposed audience. Still, two main scenarios should be considered.

        Financial loss

        Financial losses can occur when a secret is used to access a paid third-party-provided service and is disclosed as part of the source code of client applications. Having the secret, each user of the application will be able to use it without limit to use the third party service to their own need, including in a way that was not expected.

        This additional use of the secret will lead to added costs with the service provider.

        Moreover, when rate or volume limiting is set up on the provider side, this additional use can prevent the regular operation of the affected application. This might result in a partial denial of service for all the application’s users.

        Application’s security downgrade

        A downgrade can happen when the disclosed secret is used to protect security-sensitive assets or features of the application. Depending on the affected asset or feature, the practical impact can range from a sensitive information leak to a complete takeover of the application, its hosting server or another linked component.

        For example, an application that would disclose a secret used to sign user authentication tokens would be at risk of user identity impersonation. An attacker accessing the leaked secret could sign session tokens for arbitrary users and take over their privileges and entitlements.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use