SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
C#

C# static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your C# code

  • All rules 493
  • Vulnerability46
  • Bug88
  • Security Hotspot24
  • Code Smell335

  • Quick Fix 61
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to traversing attacks

           Vulnerability
        2. Content Security Policies should be restrictive

           Vulnerability
        3. JWT secret keys should not be disclosed

           Vulnerability
        4. Stack traces should not be disclosed

           Vulnerability
        5. Loop boundaries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        6. Connection strings should not be vulnerable to injections attacks

           Vulnerability
        7. Memory allocations should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        8. Accessing files should not lead to filesystem oracle attacks

           Vulnerability
        9. Environment variables should not be defined from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        10. XML operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        11. XML signatures should be validated securely

           Vulnerability
        12. Applications should not create session cookies from untrusted input

           Vulnerability
        13. Reflection should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        14. Extracting archives should not lead to zip slip vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        15. OS commands should not be vulnerable to argument injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        16. Types allowed to be deserialized should be restricted

           Vulnerability
        17. JWT should be signed and verified with strong cipher algorithms

           Vulnerability
        18. Cipher algorithms should be robust

           Vulnerability
        19. Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme

           Vulnerability
        20. Insecure temporary file creation methods should not be used

           Vulnerability
        21. Passwords should not be stored in plaintext or with a fast hashing algorithm

           Vulnerability
        22. Dynamic code execution should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        23. NoSQL operations should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        24. HTTP request redirections should not be open to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        25. Logging should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        26. Server-side requests should not be vulnerable to forging attacks

           Vulnerability
        27. Deserialization should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        28. Endpoints should not be vulnerable to reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks

           Vulnerability
        29. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        30. LDAP connections should be authenticated

           Vulnerability
        31. Cryptographic keys should be robust

           Vulnerability
        32. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        33. Secure random number generators should not output predictable values

           Vulnerability
        34. Serialization constructors should be secured

           Vulnerability
        35. Members should not have conflicting transparency annotations

           Vulnerability
        36. "CoSetProxyBlanket" and "CoInitializeSecurity" should not be used

           Vulnerability
        37. Database queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        38. Cipher Block Chaining IVs should be unpredictable

           Vulnerability
        39. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

           Vulnerability
        40. Regular expressions should not be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks

           Vulnerability
        41. A secure password should be used when connecting to a database

           Vulnerability
        42. XPath expressions should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        43. I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        44. LDAP queries should not be vulnerable to injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        45. OS commands should not be vulnerable to command injection attacks

           Vulnerability
        46. Password hashing functions should use an unpredictable salt

           Vulnerability

        Secure random number generators should not output predictable values

        intentionality - logical
        security
        Vulnerability
        • cwe
        • pitfall
        • symbolic-execution

        Cryptographic operations often rely on unpredictable random numbers to enhance security. These random numbers are created by cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generators (CSPRNG). It is important not to use a predictable seed with these random number generators otherwise the random numbers will also become predictable.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        Implementation Specification

        Random number generators are often used to generate random values for cryptographic algorithms. When a random number generator is used for cryptographic purposes, the generated numbers must be as random and unpredictable as possible. When the random number generator is improperly seeded with a constant or a predictable value, its output will also be predictable.

        This can have severe security implications for cryptographic operations that rely on the randomness of the generated numbers. By using a predictable seed, an attacker can potentially guess or deduce the generated numbers, compromising the security of whatever cryptographic algorithm relies on the random number generator.

        What is the potential impact?

        It is crucial to understand that the strength of cryptographic algorithms heavily relies on the quality of the random numbers used. By improperly seeding a CSPRNG, we introduce a significant weakness that can be exploited by attackers.

        Insecure cryptographic keys

        One of the primary use cases for CSPRNGs is generating cryptographic keys. If an attacker can predict the seed used to initialize the random number generator, they may be able to derive the same keys. Depending on the use case, this can lead to multiple severe outcomes, such as:

        • Being able to decrypt sensitive documents, leading to privacy breaches or identity theft.
        • Gaining access to a private key used for signing, allowing an attacker to forge digital signatures and impersonate legitimate entities.
        • Bypassing authentication mechanisms that rely on public-key infrastructure (PKI), which can be abused to gain unauthorized access to systems or networks.

        Session hijacking and man-in-the-middle attack

        Another scenario where this vulnerability can be exploited is in the generation of session tokens or nonces for secure communication protocols. If an attacker can predict the seed used to generate these tokens, they can impersonate legitimate users or intercept sensitive information.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          10.6

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use