SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
C

C static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your C code

  • All rules 315
  • Vulnerability13
  • Bug76
  • Security Hotspot19
  • Code Smell207

  • Quick Fix 19
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Accessing files should not introduce TOCTOU vulnerabilities

           Vulnerability
        2. Account validity should be verified when authenticating users with PAM

           Vulnerability
        3. "memset" should not be used to delete sensitive data

           Vulnerability
        4. POSIX functions should not be called with arguments that trigger buffer overflows

           Vulnerability
        5. Cipher algorithms should be robust

           Vulnerability
        6. Encryption algorithms should be used with secure mode and padding scheme

           Vulnerability
        7. Server hostnames should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        8. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        9. Cryptographic keys should be robust

           Vulnerability
        10. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        11. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

           Vulnerability
        12. Insecure functions should not be used

           Vulnerability
        13. "scanf()" and "fscanf()" format strings should specify a field width for the "%s" string placeholder

           Vulnerability

        XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

        intentionality - complete
        security
        Vulnerability
        • cwe
        • symbolic-execution

        This vulnerability allows the usage of external entities in XML.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        External Entity Processing allows for XML parsing with the involvement of external entities. However, when this functionality is enabled without proper precautions, it can lead to a vulnerability known as XML External Entity (XXE) attack.

        What is the potential impact?

        Exposing sensitive data

        One significant danger of XXE vulnerabilities is the potential for sensitive data exposure. By crafting malicious XML payloads, attackers can reference external entities that contain sensitive information, such as system files, database credentials, or configuration files. When these entities are processed during XML parsing, the attacker can extract the contents and gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. This poses a severe threat to the confidentiality of critical information.

        Exhausting system resources

        Another consequence of XXE vulnerabilities is the potential for denial-of-service attacks. By exploiting the ability to include external entities, attackers can construct XML payloads that cause resource exhaustion. This can overwhelm the system’s memory, CPU, or other critical resources, leading to system unresponsiveness or crashes. A successful DoS attack can disrupt the availability of services and negatively impact the user experience.

        Forging requests

        XXE vulnerabilities can also enable Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. By leveraging the ability to include external entities, an attacker can make the vulnerable application send arbitrary requests to other internal or external systems. This can result in unintended actions, such as retrieving data from internal resources, scanning internal networks, or attacking other systems. SSRF attacks can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized data access, system compromise, or even further exploitation within the network infrastructure.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use