SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
C

C static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your C code

  • All rules 420
  • Vulnerability14
  • Bug111
  • Security Hotspot19
  • Code Smell276

  • Quick Fix 27
Filtered: 45 rules found
symbolic-execution
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. The address of an automatic object should not be assigned to another object that may persist after the first object has ceased to exist

           Bug
        2. Variables should be initialized before use

           Bug
        3. Variables should not be accessed outside of their scope

           Bug
        4. Account validity should be verified when authenticating users with PAM

           Vulnerability
        5. Changing directories improperly when using "chroot" is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        6. POSIX functions should not be called with arguments that trigger buffer overflows

           Vulnerability
        7. Server hostnames should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        8. "pthread_mutex_t" should be unlocked in the reverse order they were locked

           Bug
        9. Only valid arguments should be passed to UNIX/POSIX functions

           Code Smell
        10. "pthread_mutex_t" should be properly initialized and destroyed

           Bug
        11. "pthread_mutex_t" should not be locked when already locked, or unlocked when already unlocked

           Bug
        12. Only valid arguments should be passed to stream functions

           Code Smell
        13. Using publicly writable directories is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        14. Using clear-text protocols is security-sensitive

           Security Hotspot
        15. Blocking functions should not be called inside critical sections

           Code Smell
        16. Return value of "setuid" family of functions should always be checked

           Code Smell
        17. Size of variable length arrays should be greater than zero

           Code Smell
        18. "mktemp" family of functions templates should have at least six trailing "X"s

           Code Smell
        19. Appropriate size arguments should be passed to "strncat" and "strlcpy"

           Code Smell
        20. Server certificates should be verified during SSL/TLS connections

           Vulnerability
        21. Weak SSL/TLS protocols should not be used

           Vulnerability
        22. Integral operations should not overflow

           Bug
        23. Parameter values should be appropriate

           Bug
        24. Stack allocated memory and non-owned memory should not be freed

           Bug
        25. Closed resources should not be accessed

           Bug
        26. Dynamically allocated memory should be released

           Bug
        27. Freed memory should not be used

           Bug
        28. Memory locations should not be released more than once

           Bug
        29. Memory access should be explicitly bounded to prevent buffer overflows

           Bug
        30. Zero should not be a possible denominator

           Bug
        31. XML parsers should not be vulnerable to XXE attacks

           Vulnerability
        32. "nonnull" parameters and return values of "returns_nonnull" functions should not be null

           Bug
        33. Null pointers should not be dereferenced

           Bug
        34. Resources should be closed

           Bug
        35. Unused assignments should be removed

           Code Smell
        36. Reads and writes on the same file stream shall be separated by a positioning operation

           Bug
        37. The pointer returned by the C++ Standard Library functions "asctime", "ctime", "gmtime", "localtime", "localeconv", "getenv", "setlocale" or "strerror" must not be used following a subsequent call to the same function

           Bug
        38. The value of an object must not be read before it has been set

           Bug
        39. The right-hand operand of a logical "&&" or "||" operator should not contain "persistent side effects"

           Bug
        40. The built-in relational operators ">", ">=", "<" and "<=" shall not be applied to objects of pointer type, except where they point to elements of the same array

           Bug
        41. Subtraction between pointers shall only be applied to pointers that address elements of the same array

           Bug
        42. Pointer arithmetic shall not form an invalid pointer

           Bug
        43. An object or subobject must not be copied to an overlapping object

           Bug
        44. A value should not be "unnecessarily written" to a local object

           Code Smell
        45. Controlling expressions should not be invariant

           Bug

        Pointer arithmetic shall not form an invalid pointer

        intentionality - logical
        reliability
        Bug
        • unpredictable
        • symbolic-execution
        • misra-c++2023
        • misra-required

        Why is this an issue?

        More Info

        This rule is part of MISRA C++:2023.

        Usage of this content is governed by Sonar’s terms and conditions. Redistribution is prohibited.

        Rule 8.7.1 - Pointer arithmetic shall not form an invalid pointer

        [expr.add] Undefined 4

        Category: Required

        Analysis: Undecidable,System

        Amplification

        This rule applies to all forms of pointer arithmetic, including array indexing:

        integer_expression + pointer_expression
        pointer_expression + integer_expression
        pointer_expression - integer_expression
        pointer_expression += integer_expression
        pointer_expression -= integer_expression
        ++pointer_expression
        --pointer_expression
        pointer_expression++
        pointer_expression--
        pointer_expression [ integer_expression ]
        integer_expression [ pointer_expression ]
        

        A pointer resulting from pointer arithmetic is invalid if it does not point to:

        • An element of the same array as the original pointer; or
        • One past the end of the same array as the original pointer.

        This rule also applies to pointer arithmetic that occurs within the C++ Standard Library functions. In addition, it is assumed that the implementation of the functions listed below perform pointer arithmetic on their pointer parameters:

        memchr, memcmp, memcpy, memmove, memset, strncat, strncmp, strncpy, strxfrm

        Note: a pointer to an object that is not an array is treated as if it were a pointer to the first element of an array with a single element.

        Rationale

        Undefined behaviour occurs if the result obtained from one of the above expressions is not a pointer to an element of the array pointed to by pointer_expression, or a pointer to one beyond the end of that array.

        Note: dereferencing an invalid pointer, including a pointer to one past the end of an array, results in undefined behaviour — this is targeted by M23_393: MISRA C++ 2023 Rule 4.1.3.

        Example

        int32_t * f1( int32_t * const a1, int32_t a2[ 10 ], int32_t ( &a3 )[ 10 ] )
        {
          a1[ 3 ] = 0;                  // Compliant only if the array pointed
                                        // to by 'a1' has at least 4 elements
        
          *( a2 + 9 ) = 0;              // Compliant only if the array pointed
                                        // to by 'a2' has at least 10 elements
        
          return a3 + 9;                // Compliant
        }
        
        void f2()
        {
          int32_t a1[ 10 ] = { };
        
          int32_t * p1 = &a1[  0 ];     // Compliant
          int32_t * p2 = a1 + 10;       // Compliant - points to one beyond and
          int32_t    i = *p2;           //             dereferencing is undefined behaviour
          int32_t * p3 = a1 + 11;       // Non-compliant - points to two beyond, resulting
                                        //                 in undefined behaviour
        
          p1++;                         // Compliant
          a1[ -1 ] = 0;                 // Non-compliant - exceeding array bounds results
                                        //                 in undefined behaviour
          i = *( &i + 0 );              // Compliant     - 'i' is treated as an array
                                        //                 of size 1
        
          // This declaration has 6 arrays:
          //   1 array of 5 elements of type array of int32_t
          //   5 arrays of 2 elements of type int32_t
          int32_t a2[ 5 ][ 2 ] = { };
        
          a2[ 3 ][ 1 ] = 0;             // Compliant
          i = *( *( a2 + 3 ) + 1 );     // Compliant
          i = a2[ 2 ][ 3 ];             // Non-compliant - exceeding array bounds results
                                        //                 in undefined behaviour
        
          int32_t * p4 = a2[ 1 ];       // Compliant
        
          i = p4[ 1 ];                  // Compliant - p4 addresses an array of size 2
        }
        

        The following example illustrates pointer arithmetic applied to members of a structure. Because each member is an object in its own right, this rule prevents the use of pointer arithmetic to move from one member to the next.

        struct
        {
          uint16_t x;
          uint16_t y;
          uint16_t a[ 10 ];
        } s;
        
        void f3()
        {
          uint16_t * p { &s.x };
        
          ++p;                          // Compliant - p points one past the end of s.x,
                                        //   but this cannot be assumed to point to s.y
          *p = 0;                       //   and dereferencing is undefined behaviour
        
          ++p;                          // Non-compliant - more than one past the end
        
        
          p = &s.a[ 0 ];                // Compliant     - p points into s.a
          p = p + 8;                    // Compliant     - p still points into s.a
          p = p + 3;                    // Non-compliant - more than one past the end
        }
        

        The following example shows that the implicit pointer arithmetic within library functions can lead to accesses beyond the end of an array:

        uint8_t buf1[ 5 ] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
        uint8_t buf2[ 7 ] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
        
        void f4()
        {
          if ( std::memcmp( buf1, buf2, 5 ) == 0 ) {}    // Compliant
          if ( std::memcmp( buf1, buf2, 7 ) == 0 ) {}    // Non-compliant
        
          auto p1 = std::next( buf1, 3 );                // Compliant
          auto p2 = std::next( buf1, 7 );                // Non-compliant
        }
        

        Copyright The MISRA Consortium Limited © 2023

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI

        © 2025 SonarSource Sàrl. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use