SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
C

C static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your C code

  • All rules 315
  • Vulnerability13
  • Bug76
  • Security Hotspot19
  • Code Smell207

  • Quick Fix 19
Filtered: 37 rules found
suspicious
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. "offsetof" macro should not be used

           Code Smell
        2. "errno" should not be used

           Code Smell
        3. Function names should be used either as a call with a parameter list or with the "&" operator

           Code Smell
        4. "enum" values should not be used as operands to built-in operators other than [ ], =, ==, !=, unary &, and the relational operators <, <=, >, >=

           Code Smell
        5. "bool" expressions should not be used as operands to built-in operators other than =, &&, ||, !, ==, !=, unary &, and the conditional operator

           Code Smell
        6. A cast shall not remove any const or volatile qualification from the type of a pointer or reference

           Code Smell
        7. Trigraphs should not be used

           Code Smell
        8. "#pragma pack" should be used correctly

           Bug
        9. Only valid arguments should be passed to UNIX/POSIX functions

           Code Smell
        10. Only valid arguments should be passed to stream functions

           Code Smell
        11. "^" should not be confused with exponentiation

           Code Smell
        12. Size of variable length arrays should be greater than zero

           Code Smell
        13. "mktemp" family of functions templates should have at least six trailing "X"s

           Code Smell
        14. Unevaluated operands should not have side effects

           Code Smell
        15. Size argument of memory functions should be consistent

           Code Smell
        16. Return value of "nodiscard" functions should not be ignored

           Code Smell
        17. Implicit casts should not lower precision

           Code Smell
        18. Appropriate size arguments should be passed to "strncat" and "strlcpy"

           Code Smell
        19. User-defined types should not be passed as variadic arguments

           Bug
        20. Array values should not be replaced unconditionally

           Bug
        21. A conditionally executed single line should be denoted by indentation

           Code Smell
        22. Conditionals should start on new lines

           Code Smell
        23. "case" ranges should cover multiple values

           Code Smell
        24. "switch" statements should cover all cases

           Code Smell
        25. Redundant pointer operator sequences should be removed

           Code Smell
        26. Conditionally executed code should be reachable

           Bug
        27. Flexible array members should not be declared

           Code Smell
        28. Track parsing failures

           Code Smell
        29. Recursion should not be infinite

           Bug
        30. Two branches in a conditional structure should not have exactly the same implementation

           Code Smell
        31. Pre-defined macros should not be defined, redefined or undefined

           Code Smell
        32. Switch cases should end with an unconditional "break" statement

           Code Smell
        33. "switch" statements should not contain non-case labels

           Code Smell
        34. Methods should not be empty

           Code Smell
        35. Assignments should not be made from within conditions

           Code Smell
        36. Variables should not be shadowed

           Code Smell
        37. Nested blocks of code should not be left empty

           Code Smell

        Size of variable length arrays should be greater than zero

        intentionality - logical
        maintainability
        Code Smell
        • symbolic-execution
        • suspicious

        Creating a Variable Length Array (VLA) with a size that is not greater than zero leads to undefined behavior.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        Going the extra mile

        More Info

        Variable length arrays are used to allocate a stack size for the number of elements that are known at the runtime, for example:

        void merge(int* tab, int size, int first) {
          int res[size]; // allocate buffer for merging on stack
          /* Code that merges two sorted ranges [tab, tab + first) and [tab + first, tab + last)
           * into res buffer.
           * ....
           */
          // copy merged data into input
          memcpy(tab, res, size * sizeof(int));
        }
        

        The syntax follows the one used by an array with static size (where size is a constant), and the value placed in the square brackets ([size] in the above example) determines the size of the array. For both static and runtime-sized arrays, the size is required to be greater than zero. However, in the case of VLAs, this cannot be checked by the compiler, and any program that creates such an array with a size that has a value of zero or is negative, has undefined behavior.

        void example() {
          int s = -1;
          int vla[s];  // program compiles, and have undefined behavior
          int arr[-1]; // program is ill-formed
        }
        

        This defect may also manifest when the variable used as size is not initialized. Uninitialized variables might have zero, negative, or any value at each time the program executes.

        void uninitialized() {
          int s;      // uninitialized, the value is not determined
          int vla[s]; // program compiles, have undefined behavior if the value read from s is negative or zero
        }
        

        A non-positive size of the VLAs may also result from using a value loaded by the program from a file or other external resources used as size without previous validation. Such values as usually referred to as being tainted.

        void loadFromInput() {
          int size = -1;
          scanf("%d", &size); // loads size from input
          char bytes[size];   // size may be negative
          /* ... */
        }
        

        The above code will lead to undefined behavior when the value of the size load from the input is not greater than zero. This may happen due to source data corruption, accidental user mistake, or malicious action.

        What is the potential impact?

        Creating a variable length array with a size smaller or equal to zero leads to undefined behavior. This means the compiler is not bound by the language standard anymore, and your program has no meaning assigned to it.

        Practically this can lead to a wide range of effects and may lead to the following:

        • crashes, in particular segmentation faults, when the program access memory that it is not allowed to,
        • memory corruption and data losses, when the program overwrites bytes responsible for storing data or executable code,
        • stack overflow, when negative size is interpreted as a large positive number.

        Furthermore, in a situation when VLA size is dependent on the user input, it can lead to vulnerabilities in the program.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
          in your IDE
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
        • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
          on-premise CI
          Developer Edition
          Available Since
          9.1

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use