SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Apex

Apex static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your APEX code

  • All rules 97
  • Vulnerability2
  • Bug26
  • Security Hotspot3
  • Code Smell66
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. Apex classes should contain at most one "@InvocableMethod" annotation

           Bug
        2. DML operations in catch blocks can mask original exceptions

           Bug
        3. Future methods must be static and return void

           Bug
        4. Test classes should have only one @testSetup method

           Bug
        5. Methods with "@AuraEnabled" should be public or global

           Bug
        6. Classes implementing "Database.Batchable" should be declared as "global"

           Bug
        7. Future methods making HTTP callouts should include "callout=true" parameter

           Bug
        8. Future methods should not call other future methods

           Bug
        9. SOQL queries should include LIMIT clauses to prevent hitting governor limits

           Bug
        10. SOQL queries should be assigned to Lists to avoid QueryException

           Bug
        11. Test methods should not have parameters

           Bug
        12. URLs should not be hardcoded in Apex code

           Bug
        13. "@future" methods should not be called in loops

           Bug
        14. Email messages should be sent in batches

           Bug
        15. URLs of Salesforce pages should be relative, not absolute.

           Bug
        16. "getRecordTypeInfosByDeveloperName()" should be used instead of "getRecordTypeInfosByName()"

           Bug
        17. DML statements should not be used inside loops

           Bug
        18. Record IDs should not be hardcoded

           Bug
        19. Triggers should process records in bulk

           Bug
        20. All branches in a conditional structure should not have exactly the same implementation

           Bug
        21. Non-existent operators like "=+" should not be used

           Bug
        22. Related "if"/"else if" statements and "when" in a "switch" should not have the same condition

           Bug
        23. Identical expressions should not be used on both sides of a binary operator

           Bug
        24. All code should be reachable

           Bug
        25. Variables should not be self-assigned

           Bug
        26. Useless "if(true) {...}" and "if(false){...}" blocks should be removed

           Bug

        Future methods must be static and return void

        intentionality - logical
        reliability
        Bug
        • apex
        • async

        This rule raises an issue when a method annotated with @future is not declared as static or does not have a void return type.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        Methods annotated with @future in Apex execute asynchronously in a separate thread when system resources become available. This asynchronous execution model has two fundamental requirements:

        First, future methods must be static because they cannot rely on instance state. When a future method executes, it runs independently of the original calling context, potentially long after the original object instance has been destroyed or modified. Static methods ensure the code can execute without requiring access to instance variables or methods.

        Second, future methods must return void because they cannot return values to the calling code. The calling thread continues execution immediately after invoking the future method, without waiting for its completion. By the time the future method actually executes, the original caller has already moved on, making it impossible to receive any return value.

        These are not just recommendations but strict compilation requirements enforced by the Apex compiler. Any attempt to declare a future method as non-static or with a non-void return type will result in compilation errors, preventing the code from being saved or deployed.

        What is the potential impact?

        Violating this rule will cause compilation errors, preventing the code from being saved, deployed, or executed. This breaks the build process and blocks development progress until the method signature is corrected.

          Available In:
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories

        © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use