SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
Apex

Apex static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your APEX code

  • All rules 97
  • Vulnerability2
  • Bug26
  • Security Hotspot3
  • Code Smell66
Filtered: 22 rules found
salesforce
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. SOQL queries should not contain hardcoded date literals

           Code Smell
        2. Apex classes should contain at most one "@InvocableMethod" annotation

           Bug
        3. SOQL queries should not be executed inside loops

           Code Smell
        4. SOSL queries in test methods should use "Test.setFixedSearchResults"

           Code Smell
        5. DML operations in catch blocks can mask original exceptions

           Bug
        6. Test classes and methods should not use "seeAllData=true"

           Code Smell
        7. HTTP requests should have explicit timeout configuration

           Code Smell
        8. Methods with "@AuraEnabled" should be public or global

           Bug
        9. Classes implementing "Database.Batchable" should be declared as "global"

           Bug
        10. "getRoleAndSubordinates()" should be replaced with "getRoleAndSubordinatesInternal()"

           Code Smell
        11. Future methods making HTTP callouts should include "callout=true" parameter

           Bug
        12. SOQL queries should use SystemModStamp instead of LastModifiedDate for better performance

           Code Smell
        13. Future methods should not call other future methods

           Bug
        14. Test classes should be annotated with "@isTest"

           Code Smell
        15. SOQL queries should include LIMIT clauses to prevent hitting governor limits

           Bug
        16. Private members made public for testing should use "@TestVisible" annotation

           Code Smell
        17. Batch Apex scope parameters should not exceed 2000 records

           Code Smell
        18. Custom event names should not be prefixed with "on"

           Code Smell
        19. Apex REST services should implement comprehensive exception handling

           Vulnerability
        20. SOQL queries should be assigned to Lists to avoid QueryException

           Bug
        21. InvocableMethod annotations should include descriptive label and description

           Code Smell
        22. URLs should not be hardcoded in Apex code

           Bug

        Future methods should not call other future methods

        intentionality - logical
        reliability
        maintainability
        Bug
        • salesforce

        This rule raises an issue when a method annotated with @future calls another method that is also annotated with @future.

        Why is this an issue?

        How can I fix it?

        More Info

        Future methods in Salesforce Apex are designed to execute asynchronously when system resources become available. They run in their own thread and are queued for execution.

        The Salesforce platform explicitly prohibits future methods from calling other future methods. This restriction exists because:

        • Future methods are already executing asynchronously, and chaining them creates unpredictable execution patterns
        • The platform cannot guarantee the order of execution for chained future methods
        • Resource management becomes complex when future methods spawn additional future methods
        • It can lead to cascading asynchronous operations that are difficult to monitor and debug

        When a future method attempts to call another future method, the Salesforce runtime will throw an exception, causing the operation to fail.

        What is the potential impact?

        Violating this rule will result in a runtime exception when the code executes. The calling future method will fail, potentially leaving business processes incomplete.

        This can lead to:

        • Data inconsistency if the failed operation was part of a larger business process
        • Poor user experience due to unexpected failures
        • Difficulty in debugging and monitoring asynchronous operations
        • Unreliable system behavior in production environments
          Available In:
        • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories

        © 2025 SonarSource Sàrl. All rights reserved.

        Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use