SonarSource Rules
  • Products

    In-IDE

    Code Quality and Security in your IDE with SonarQube Ide

    IDE extension that lets you fix coding issues before they exist!

    Discover SonarQube for IDE

    SaaS

    Code Quality and Security in the cloud with SonarQube Cloud

    Setup is effortless and analysis is automatic for most languages

    Discover SonarQube Cloud

    Self-Hosted

    Code Quality and Security Self-Hosted with SonarQube Server

    Fast, accurate analysis; enterprise scalability

    Discover SonarQube Server
  • SecretsSecrets
  • ABAPABAP
  • AnsibleAnsible
  • ApexApex
  • AzureResourceManagerAzureResourceManager
  • CC
  • C#C#
  • C++C++
  • CloudFormationCloudFormation
  • COBOLCOBOL
  • CSSCSS
  • DartDart
  • DockerDocker
  • FlexFlex
  • GitHub ActionsGitHub Actions
  • GoGo
  • HTMLHTML
  • JavaJava
  • JavaScriptJavaScript
  • JSONJSON
  • JCLJCL
  • KotlinKotlin
  • KubernetesKubernetes
  • Objective CObjective C
  • PHPPHP
  • PL/IPL/I
  • PL/SQLPL/SQL
  • PythonPython
  • RPGRPG
  • RubyRuby
  • RustRust
  • ScalaScala
  • ShellShell
  • SwiftSwift
  • TerraformTerraform
  • TextText
  • TypeScriptTypeScript
  • T-SQLT-SQL
  • VB.NETVB.NET
  • VB6VB6
  • XMLXML
  • YAMLYAML
ABAP

ABAP static code analysis

Unique rules to find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells in your ABAP code

  • All rules 94
  • Vulnerability4
  • Bug14
  • Security Hotspot7
  • Code Smell69
 
Tags
    Impact
      Clean code attribute
        1. "SY-SUBRC" should be checked after an "AUTHORITY-CHECK" statement

           Vulnerability
        2. Authorization checks should not rely on hardcoded user properties

           Vulnerability
        3. "CATCH" clauses should not be empty

           Vulnerability
        4. "BREAK-POINT" statement should not be used in production

           Vulnerability

        Authorization checks should not rely on hardcoded user properties

        responsibility - trustworthy
        security
        Vulnerability

          Why is this an issue?

          Checking logged users' permissions by comparing their name to a hardcoded string can create security vulnerabilities. It prevents system administrators from changing users' permissions when needed (example: when their account has been compromised). Thus system fields SY-UNAME and SYST-UNAME should not be compared to hardcoded strings. Use instead AUTHORITY-CHECK to check users' permissions.

          This rule raises an issue when either of the system fields SY-UNAME or SYST-UNAME are compared to a hardcoded value in a CASE statement or using one of the following operators: =, EQ, <>, NE.

          Noncompliant code example

          IF SY-UNAME = 'ALICE'. " Noncompliant
          ENDIF.
          
          CASE SY-UNAME.
          WHEN 'A'. " Noncompliant
          ENDCASE.
          

          Compliant solution

          AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_CARRID'
            ID 'CARRID' FIELD mycarrid.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
            MESSAGE 'Not authorized' TYPE 'E'.
          ENDIF.
          
            Available In:
          • SonarQube IdeCatch issues on the fly,
            in your IDE
          • SonarQube CloudDetect issues in your GitHub, Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket Cloud, GitLab repositories
          • SonarQube ServerAnalyze code in your
            on-premise CI
            Developer Edition
            Available Since
            9.1

          © 2008-2025 SonarSource SA. All rights reserved.

          Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use